International Indian Icon (3iii) – Fair & Comprehensive Judging Criteria

At International Indian Icon (3iii), we uphold the highest standards of fairness, inclusivity, and transparency in our judging process. There are no biases, no regional, cultural, linguistic, or geographical restrictions—every participant is judged purely on the basis of talent.

Our panel of expert judges follows a structured and comprehensive evaluation system, ensuring that every contestant—regardless of age or background—receives an equal opportunity to showcase their skills on a global platform.

3iii JUDGING CRITERIA

SINGING Evaluation Criteria

        Solo Singing Evaluation Criteria

1. Vocal Quality
   Assessment of the singer’s tone, clarity, vocal texture, dynamic control, and pronunciation. Focuses on overall vocal strength and consistency.
2. Rhythm & Timing
   Evaluation of the singer’s ability to stay on beat, maintain consistent tempo, and align with the musical rhythm throughout the performance.
3. Lyrics Proficiency
   Accuracy and fluency in delivering the lyrics, including memorization, diction, and articulation.
4. Artistic Presentation
   Analysis of mood, intensity, style, phrasing, tempo, climax, dynamics, and word emphasis—contributing to the song's overall emotional impact.
5. Musicianship
   Judged on tonal expression, breath control, vocal projection, memory, rhythm precision, and technical control of the voice.
6. Expressivity & Interpretation
   Ability to emotionally engage the audience and convey the meaning of the song through vocal nuances and interpretation.
7. Performance Execution
   Overall act quality, including pitch accuracy, stage presence, confidence, and the impression left on the audience and judges.

       Duet Singing Evaluation Criteria

1. Vocal Quality & Blend
   Assessment of vocal tone, clarity, control, dynamics, and how well the voices complement each other in harmony and texture.
2. Timing & Synchronization
   Evaluation of rhythm alignment, coordination between singers, and overall timing. Identifies any off-beat or off-key moments.
3. Lyrics Proficiency
   Mastery of lyrics, including memorization, pronunciation, and lyrical clarity during the performance.
4. Artistic Presentation
   Analysis of the duo's expressive style, stage presence, mood, tempo, phrasing, and overall delivery impact.
5. Musicality & Expression
   Evaluation of tonal expression, breath control, vocal projection, emotional depth, and pitch/rhythm accuracy.
6. Performance Execution
   Overall coordination, stage interaction, harmony, and the final impression left by the act as a complete artistic presentation.

        Group Singing Evaluation Category

1. Vocal Quality
   Assessment of voice clarity, tone, pitch control, dynamics, pronunciation, and overall vocal texture.
2. Timing & Synchronization
   Evaluation of how well the group maintains rhythm and sings in unison, including harmony alignment and detection of any off-key vocals.
3. Lyrics Mastery
   Confidence and accuracy in delivering lyrics from memory, including articulation and fluency.
4. Presentation
   Overall performance style, including stage presence, mood, emotional delivery, visual coordination, and audience engagement.
5. Overall Impact
   The impression left by the performance as a whole—covering creativity, expressiveness, technical proficiency, and the ability to captivate the audience.

DANCE Judging Criteria

Solo Dance Performance Evaluation Criteria

1. Choreographic Precision
   Assessment of coordination, synchronization, and alignment with rhythm and music throughout the routine.
2. Grace & Body Control
   Evaluation of posture, movement fluidity, balance, and expressive body language.
3. Facial Expressions
   Ability to convey emotions and enhance the storytelling element of the performance through facial engagement.
4. Technical Complexity
   Level of difficulty, originality, and intricacy in dance steps, transitions, and execution.
5. Overall Stage Presence
   Judgment of artistic interpretation, creativity, confidence, and the overall visual and emotional impact of the performance.Duet Dance Performance Evaluation Criteria
6. Precision & Synchronization
   Evaluation of how well both dancers move in harmony with each other and stay aligned with the rhythm and music.
7. Grace & Expression
   Assessment of elegance, posture, and the fluidity of movement displayed as a coordinated pair.
8. Facial Expression & Storytelling
   Use of facial expressions to convey emotion, enhance performance depth, and engage the audience through visual storytelling.
9. Choreographic Complexity
   Degree of difficulty, creativity, and execution of movements within the duet structure.
10. Overall Presentation & Chemistry
    Impression of the act as a whole—artistic interpretation, stage presence, chemistry between partners, and audience impact.

       Duet / Group Dance Performance Evaluation Criteria

1. Coordination & Precision
   Evaluation of the group’s synchronization, timing, and seamless movement in alignment with rhythm and music.
2. Collective Grace
   Assessment of overall posture, body control, and harmony in expressive movement across all performers.
3. Facial Expression & Engagement
   Consistency in emotional expression and audience engagement demonstrated by all group members.
4. Choreographic Complexity
   Level of difficulty in formations, transitions, spatial usage, and overall choreography execution.
5. Overall Impact & Presentation
   Judgement of thematic expression, performance energy, creativity, and the lasting impression delivered to the audience.

FASHION Category (Judging Criteria)

1. Runway Presence
   Evaluation of poise, confidence, and fluidity in catwalk/ramp walk presentation.
2. Style, Pose & Elegance
   Assessment of fashion sense, posing technique, and overall elegance in body language.
3. Confidence & Charisma
   Judging the participant’s stage confidence, personality, and unique “X-Factor” appeal.
4. Attire & Photogenic Appeal
   Review of outfit selection, coordination, and on-camera visual impact.
5. Communication & Q&A Round
   Evaluation of verbal expression, clarity, and confidence during interactive rounds or Q&A sessions.

ACTING Judgement Criteria

1. Stage Presence & Commitment
   The performer displays full preparedness, enthusiasm, and commitment to the role.
2. Character Styling & Presentation
   Costumes, makeup, hair, and accessories are appropriate and enhance character portrayal.
3. Expressiveness & Voice Control
   Use of facial expressions, body language, and vocal delivery to convey emotion and bring the character to life.
4. Creative Use of Props & Effects
   Integration of costumes, props, music, and sound effects to set the tone and environment for the performance.
5. Stage Utilization & Choreographed Movement
   Confident and intentional use of the performance space with planned movements that enrich the character portrayal.

INSTRUMENTAL Performance Criteria

1. Technique & Musicianship
   Assessment of technical skills, including meter, melody, finger and hand positioning, articulation (slurs, accents, attacks, cutoffs), tonguing, breath control, precision, accuracy, and memorization.
2. Musical Interpretation
   Evaluation of how well the performer conveys the piece through tempo control, stylistic choices, phrasing, and dynamic variation.
3. Stage Presentation
   Judgment based on stage presence, body posture, instrument handling, poise, and overall balance during the performance.
4. Tone Quality
   Analysis of tone clarity, richness, strength, color, embouchure control (for wind instruments), and intonation.
5. Versatility & Repertoire Selection
   Assessment of the performer’s range and adaptability, as reflected in the selection of pieces and demonstration of diverse musical techniques and expressive behaviors.

COMEDY Performance Judging Criteria

1. Timing & Delivery
   Evaluation of comedic timing, pacing, and how effectively punchlines and humorous elements are delivered.
2. Originality & Creativity
   Assessment of the uniqueness of content, originality of jokes or sketches, and creativity in storytelling or situational humor.
3. Audience Engagement
   Measures how well the performer connects with the audience, including response, laughter, and attention retention.
4. Stage Presence & Confidence
   Evaluation of the performer's comfort, confidence, and command over the stage throughout the act.
5. Expression & Body Language
   Judging the use of facial expressions, gestures, and body movement to enhance comedic effect and character portrayal.

 I Got Talent (IGT)

Any Talent Category) 5 universal judging criteria for IGT, suitable for non-mainstream performances such as Yoga, Poetry, Writing, Painting, Judo, Karate, and other unique talents excluding Singing, Dance, Fashion, Instruments, Acting, and Comedy:

       General Judging Criteria (Non-Mainstream Talents)

1. Skill & Execution
   Assessment of the technical proficiency, accuracy, and execution of the presented talent (e.g., form in yoga, precision in martial arts, fluency in poetry, detail in art).
2. Creativity & Originality
   Evaluation of how innovative, unique, or original the performance or presentation is compared to typical displays of that talent.
3. Presentation & Stage Presence
   Overall visual or verbal presentation, confidence, and how well the performer engages with the audience or judges.
4. Difficulty & Complexity
   Judging the level of challenge involved in the talent and the complexity of the techniques or concepts demonstrated.
5. Impact & Expression
   Measures the emotional, artistic, or intellectual impact of the performance—how effectively it conveys meaning, story, or inspiration.

Our Commitment to Fairness

At 3iii, we celebrate talent without barriers—no discrimination, no biases, and no restrictions. Every contestant, from any background, is judged purely on merit. Our mission is to provide a global stage where passion, creativity, and skill shine above all else.

Join 3iii and let your talent be seen, heard, and celebrated!